The Daily T - A blog

Archive of February 2010

Peter Gabriel, scratching backs

I'm a bit late on this, I know, but Peter Gabriel has the first of two albums out entitled Scratch My Back. You can hear the whole thing at the Guardian. The concept is that he covers other artists on this album while the covered artists cover him on the next. Gabriels version of Bon Iver's Flume is a great showcase for his voice, and I like Heroes (Bowie) and Street Spirit (Radiohead) a lot too.

3 Comments

Give me an estimate

One of the less fun things about working as a software engineer is estimates. They're very difficult to get right, often pushed early by the client who naturally wants to know how much a project is going to cost them, and you'll sometimes get held to early wild guess estimates when they turn out to be terribly wrong. I enjoyed this Slashdot discussion on the topic, and there's some truth to this facetious comment:

I just ask my manager how long he's already told the client it's going to take.

At the moment, most estimates I do are done within a Scrum context, using Planning Poker or similar estimation methods. Planning poker is very simply trying to take all the pressure out of the estimation work; forget about what the client is expecting, forget what your project manager is expecting and never mind the experience of your colleagues. The estimates are not hours but relative complexity: start with a simple task and give it 2 points. Everything else is just relative from that. All developers on the team lay down their estimate card on the table at the same time, removing the bias of less experienced developers emulating the more senior developers. I know I sound like a geek when I say: it has put the fun back into estimation for me, and resulted in more accurate estimates.

I'm looking forward to the day though, when we as a business move away from expecting that we know the exact shipping feature set or cost at the start of a project. If you read any account of software projects throughout the few decades that such expectations will turn out to be wrong almost invariably. At the same time, I have respect for the client who wants to know what they're getting and at what price.

It's a difficult problem to solve.

0 Comments

MPEG LA extends h.264 free license

Via Slashdot comes word that MPEG LA is extending their free license on the h.264 codec until 2016. The patent itself though, doesn't expire until 2028, and while the world might have moved on by then, 2016 is close enough to ask the question: "What then?".

H.264, for those not in the know, is one of the codecs in the running for the de-facto next generation video standard on the web. I'm still with Mozilla on this: get it right now, it's early days and we don't want to be stuck with something as important as this on a patent-encumbered codec.

1 Comment