<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

  <title><![CDATA[The Daily T]]></title>
  <link href="http://thedailyt.com/atom.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://thedailyt.com/"/>
  <updated>2012-04-09T20:25:00+02:00</updated>
  <id>http://thedailyt.com/</id>
  <author>
    <name><![CDATA[Terje T]]></name>
    
  </author>
  <generator uri="http://octopress.org/">Octopress</generator>

  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[A positive trend]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/a-positive-trend/"/>
    <updated>2011-01-11T21:31:00+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/a-positive-trend</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I almost can&#8217;t believe it. You now get 2 x 30 minutes a day free WIFI at Amsterdam&#8217;s Schiphol airport, and turns out Montreal&#8217;s Trudeau airport has one-upped Amsterdam - offering unlimited WIFI.</p>

<p>I like where this is going!</p>

<p><strong>EDIT:</strong> add Toronto Pearson to the list. Also, Westjet showed the Canadiens vs. Islanders game for the whole flight, including the time waiting to get off. Normally the time from fastening seatbelts to the gate is lights out.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Silk]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/silk/"/>
    <updated>2011-01-10T21:34:18+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/silk</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weavesilk.com/">Silk</a> is a gorgeous looking Canvas/Javascript-based plaything. Impressive. The colours remind me of the iPad app <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/no/app/uzu/id376551723?mt=8">Uzu</a>, and I see that Silk is also coming out for iOS.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[iPhone goes 3D]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/iphone-goes-3d/"/>
    <updated>2011-01-06T14:04:08+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/iphone-goes-3d</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Step aside, <a href="http://questvisual.com/">Word Lens</a>, there&#8217;s a new <em>wow</em> iPhone app in town. If you needed any further proof that we&#8217;re now officially living in <em>The Future™</em>, look no further than <a href="http://www.trimensional.com/">Trimensional</a>, a new 3D scanner for iPhone that constructs a coloured wireframe representation of what you point it to. Impressive!</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Ecoute 2]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/ecoute-2/"/>
    <updated>2011-01-03T17:52:06+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/ecoute-2</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pixiapps.com/ecoute/">Ecoute 2</a>, a music player, is an interesting Mac app for two reasons.</p>

<p>One because it continues the iPad-styled small utility app trend set by <a href="http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-mac/">Tweetie</a> and <a href="http://sparrowapp.com/">Sparrow</a>. As the <a href="http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/">Mac App Store</a> is only three days away from opening I suspect that&#8217;s something we&#8217;ll see a lot more of in the coming weeks.</p>

<p>The other is that Ecoute is almost purely a reader for your iTunes library. I say almost because while you can&#8217;t edit any metadata in Ecoute, it does write your ratings and play counts back to your iTunes library. Ecoute is likely an answer to the complaint some have that iTunes have grown too heavy, and it really only does the most basic functions of iTunes, listing albums, artists and tracks and - of course - playing music.</p>

<p><img src="http://static.thedailyt.com/ecoute.png" title="Screenshot of Ecoute, showing a track playing, with functions for rating, viewing related YouTube videos and track Lyrics 536 271" ></p>

<p>Ecoute also has <em>YouTube</em> and <em>Lyrics</em> functions, showing related YouTube videos and track lyrics respectively. The Lyrics function didn&#8217;t work on the tracks I tried it on, but being able to quickly see related YouTube videos seems handy for finding live versions of tracks you like.</p>

<p>Ecoute costs USD 10, and might be worth it. I&#8217;ll try it out a bit and see if I can live with having to use two apps: iTunes for syncing my iOS devices, downloading podcasts and editing metadata, and Ecoute for listening.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Downhill Google?]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/downhill-google/"/>
    <updated>2011-01-03T14:52:29+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2011/01/downhill-google</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Turns out I&#8217;m not the only one who has been noticing the decline in quality search results from Google lately. And, like <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/01/trouble-in-the-house-of-google.html">Jeff Atwood</a> of Stack Overflow, I&#8217;ve tended to blame it on other factors first:</p>

<blockquote><p>Throughout my investigation I had nagging doubts that we were seeing serious cracks in the algorithmic search foundations of the house that Google built. But I was afraid to write an article about it for fear I&#8217;d be claimed an incompetent kook. I wasn&#8217;t comfortable sharing that opinion widely, because we might be doing something obviously wrong. Which we tend to do frequently and often. Gravity can&#8217;t be wrong. We&#8217;re just clumsy &#8230; right?</p></blockquote>

<p>I have, for over a year now, used <a href="http://duckduckgo.com">DuckDuckGo</a> as my primary web search engine, and I attributed the lack of good search results I was getting from Google to me being accustomed to using a different search engine. But seeing other people write about the same problem has confirmed my suspicions: Google is not doing well in the fight against spammers at the moment. Jeff Atwood&#8217;s post above is a good start, and so is Alan Patrick&#8217;s post &#8221;<a href="http://broadstuff.com/archives/2370-On-the-increasing-uselessness-of-Google......html">On the increasing uselessness of Google</a>&#8221; - accompanied by two Hacker News threads, <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2062855">here</a> and <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2061313">here</a>.</p>

<p>The main problem for me at the moment is the amount of spammy sites in programming related queries. Sites whose main mission is to scrape the excellent <a href="http://stackoverflow.com">Stack Overflow</a> for content and display it alongside as many ads as possible. If I wanted to be conspiratorial, I could agree with the following <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2062887">comment</a>, in response to someone wondering what was causing the problem:</p>

<blockquote><p>it&#8217;s not an AI problem. It&#8217;s not wanting to hurt the bottomline. Sites with more ads than anything else are banned from DuckDuckGo, for example. And that is a search engine run by 1 person only, if I am not mistaken.</p></blockquote>

<p>I have a hard time believing this cynicism, but the fact remains that you clicking onto these sites and maybe even having to click back and forth a few times to find the site you <em>actually</em> wanted, is lucrative for Google. The sites are often laden with Google Ads, so it&#8217;s not just the Google search results themselves that make money for Google, each site you click into is another ad impression for them.</p>

<p>Could it be simply that these sites are useful enough to Google&#8217;s bottom line, while at the same time <em>good enough</em> for users to click on them and get <em>something</em> out of them so they stay off the blacklist? That they lie exactly in an equilibrium of useful information vs. ad-driven pages, for enough users? To be specific: for me, these sites are difficult enough to read compared to for example Stack Overflow so that I get annoyed when I click into one of them by mistake.</p>

<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s more just a feeling rather than hard facts but as I said, seeing these posts from other credible sources has served to somewhat confirm my suspicion that Google is not doing well with their web search engine at the moment. That, coupled with new alternatives (<a href="http://blekko.com">Blekko</a> and <a href="http://duckduckgo.com">DuckDuckGo</a> for example) that for the first time offer credible alternatives - alternatives where you actually get useful, no: better, results.</p>

<p>That, coupled with the new alternatives <a href="http://blekko.com">Blekko</a> and <a href="http://duckduckgo.com">DuckDuckGo</a> for example, makes the choice simple for me. They offer credible alternatives, alternatives where you actually get useful, no: better, results.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Canabalt open sourced]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/canabalt-open-sourced/"/>
    <updated>2010-12-31T03:16:39+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/canabalt-open-sourced</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of interesting technology, the cult iOS game <a href="http://www.canabalt.com/">Canabalt</a> has been made open source. You can find it on <a href="https://github.com/ericjohnson/canabalt-ios">GitHub</a>. You can bet I&#8217;m going to check that out too.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Interesting technologies of 2010]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/interesting-technologies-of-2010/"/>
    <updated>2010-12-31T03:12:38+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/interesting-technologies-of-2010</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2053956">This Hacker News thread</a> is turning into a treasure trove of interesting technologies that people have discovered this year. I&#8217;ve already noted a few I&#8217;m going to check out.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Google heatmap of Wikileaks searches]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/google-heatmap-of-wikileaks-searches/"/>
    <updated>2010-12-10T10:52:57+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/google-heatmap-of-wikileaks-searches</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://reddit.com">Reddit</a>, I find it pretty fascinating that <a href="http://i.imgur.com/fX5Ay.jpg">a look at Google Insights</a> can reveal so much specific information that it&#8217;s possible to tell with some certainty an exact group of companies that searched a lot for <em>wikileaks</em> on Google lately.</p>

<p>The results are easily replicated: Visit Google Insights and <a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=wikileaks&amp;geo;=US&amp;cmpt;=q">look for &#8216;wikileaks&#8217;-searches in the US</a>. The results will show you a map of where searches for <em>wikileaks</em> are the most prevalent geographically in the US.</p>

<p>Drill down through the top results, Virginia - Washington, to the cities of Herndon and Sterling. So turns out a huge part of the searches for <em>wikileaks</em> in the US originated from two towns I&#8217;ve never heard about.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m a bit unclear on how they got to the last step - a Google Maps search for <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source;=s_q&amp;hl;=en&amp;geocode;=&amp;q;=Intelligence+near+Herndon,+VA,+United+States&amp;sll;=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn;=59.076726,66.796875&amp;ie;=UTF8&amp;hq;=Intelligence&amp;hnear;=Herndon,+Fairfax,+Virginia&amp;z;=13">Intelligence near Herndon, VA, United States</a> - local knowledge I suspect.</p>

<p>Based on non-identifying Google search statistics then, we got from a search word to a list of companies that probably have been quite heavy Google users recently searching for that word. And considering the potency of the Wikileaks issue as of late this is not insignificant information, even if it might not be very surprising. It&#8217;s just interesting to see how much statistics can reveal.</p>

<p>It reminds me a bit of <a href="http://http://duckduckgo.com/">DuckDuckGo</a> founder Gabriel Weinberg&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2010/05/a-fb-ad-targeted-at-one-person-my-wife.html">Facebook ad targeting a single user</a>. Weinberg managed, with a bit of local knowledge and the ad segmentation tools on Facebook, to make an ad that only showed up for his own wife.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Beautiful Pixels blog turns 1]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/beautiful-pixels-blog-turns-one/"/>
    <updated>2010-12-09T15:10:01+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/beautiful-pixels-blog-turns-one</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The blog Beautiful Pixels turns one and they&#8217;re celebrating by <a href="http://beautifulpixels.com/misc/bp-turns-1/">posting the top 10 favourites</a> from the past year.</p>

<p>Beautiful Pixels is one of the first blogs I check in the morning. Always inspirational.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Ben the Bodyguard]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/ben-the-bodyguard/"/>
    <updated>2010-12-02T13:28:54+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/ben-the-bodyguard</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The preview site for <a href="http://benthebodyguard.com/">Ben the Bodyguard</a> has been making the rounds today and I have to say it&#8217;s a gorgeous example of HTML5 and Javascript in action.</p>

<p>Visit the site and start scrolling.</p>

<p>Looks like they&#8217;ve used Paul Irish&#8217; and Divya Manian&#8217;s <a href="http://html5boilerplate.com/">HTML5 Boilerplate</a> as a starting point. So have I lately and it is a real timesaver. Sets you up with everything you need to start prototyping a modern HTML5 site.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Reeder for Mac]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/reeder-for-mac/"/>
    <updated>2010-12-01T14:51:57+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/12/reeder-for-mac</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Oooh! I&#8217;ve been waiting eagerly for <a href="http://madeatgloria.com/brewery/silvio/reeder">Reeder for Mac</a> to come out, and now it is - albeit in a public beta.</p>

<p>Reeder, as you might now, is my <a href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/08/reeder-for-ipad/">favourite newsreader for the iPad</a>, and on first glance the Mac version looks gorgeous and borrows quite heavily from the design of a standard iPad app - and indeed the Reeder iPad app itself. Can&#8217;t wait to try it further.</p>

<p><img src="http://thedailyt.com/static/reeder-screen.png" alt="Screen shot of Reeder for Mac" /></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Encoding troubles]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/encoding-troubles/"/>
    <updated>2010-11-30T11:14:14+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/encoding-troubles</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Good to see that it&#8217;s not just programmers but also journalists who are bothered by issues with text encoding:</p>

<p><img src="http://thedailyt.com/static/dn-cut.jpg" alt="Picture of Dagens Næringsliv with strange characters because of a text encoding issue" /></p>

<p>The image is from today&#8217;s paper issue of <a href="http://www.dn.no/">Dagens Næringsliv</a>. I recognise the characters all too well, no doubt the result of a text being read using the wrong encoding somewhere along the way.</p>

<p>For the non-Norwegian readers, the A with the squiggly line over it and the weird comma (EDIT: A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cedille">Cedilla</a>, I am told by my wife. The squiggle is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilde">diacritical tilde</a>.) is not part of the Norwegian alphabet.</p>

<p>If I had to make a list of my pet annoyances with computers, speaking as a programmer, the complexity of dealing with different text encodings would be high on the list. IE6 still tops that list and will for a few years still, even if I haven&#8217;t had to support it in a while.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Gimme Shelter - the individual tracks]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/gimme-shelter-the-individual-tracks/"/>
    <updated>2010-11-30T06:42:48+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/gimme-shelter-the-individual-tracks</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This is incredible to listen to, the <a href="http://www.dangerousminds.net/comments/deconstructing_gimme_shelter_listen/">individual tracks of Rolling Stones&#8217; Gimme Shelter</a>. Just the vocal track alone with Mick Jagger&#8217;s unpolished timbre along with Merry Claytons more refined soul sound. Listen on like the blog post says, though, the real magic happens when she pushes her voice past the breaking point.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s also fascinating to listen to the guitar tracks of stuff like this. When I hear the second guitar track, I immediately I think that that&#8217;s a sound that I, as a guitarist, would never use. Too much middle, too harsh. And that&#8217;s probably why I&#8217;m not famous like Keith Richards. ;)</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Beta 5 of Sparrow mail client out]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/beta-5-of-sparrow-mail-client-out/"/>
    <updated>2010-11-12T06:29:03+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/beta-5-of-sparrow-mail-client-out</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It hasn&#8217;t been long since I mentioned <a href="http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/">Sparrow</a>, the new iPad/Twitter-inspired mail client for the Mac. Now beta 5 is out and I thought it was worth mentioning for their rather <a href="http://sparrowmail.tumblr.com/post/1547251939/beta5">nice looking implementation</a> of gmail labels.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve stopped using folders, or labels as Google calls them, for my <a href="http://www.google.com/apps/">personal mail</a> because Google&#8217;s search function is good enough for me to find any mail within a few seconds, but if you&#8217;re into sorting your mail the new beta of Sparrow might be just the thing.</p>

<p>One thing I want to note is that if you use multiple labels on the same mail, it only gets the colour of the first label. Might be a turn-off to some.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Beautiful Pixels blog turns 1]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/beautiful-pixels-blog-turns-1/"/>
    <updated>2010-11-09T15:07:49+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/beautiful-pixels-blog-turns-1</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The blog Beautiful Pixels turns one and they&#8217;re celebrating by <a href="http://beautifulpixels.com/misc/bp-turns-1/">posting the top 10 favourites</a> from the past year.</p>

<p>Beautiful Pixels is one of the first blogs I check in the morning. Always inspirational.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[The invulnerable burger myth]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/the-invulnerable-burger-myth/"/>
    <updated>2010-11-08T12:01:27+01:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/11/the-invulnerable-burger-myth</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The always excellent <a href="http://aht.seriouseats.com/tags/The%20Burger%20Lab">Burger Lab</a> at Serious Eats has done a more or less <a href="http://aht.seriouseats.com/archives/2010/11/the-burger-lab-revisiting-the-myth-of-the-12-year-old-burger-testing-results.html">scientific test</a> of the claim that a McDonalds burger won&#8217;t rot because it&#8217;s full of preservatives and little nutrition. The claim has done several rounds in the media, always accompanied by rather sensationalist headlines. Good to see someone actually put it to the test.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Better mobile sites]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/10/better-mobile-sites/"/>
    <updated>2010-10-15T18:44:14+02:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/10/better-mobile-sites</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Fuchs of <a href="http://script.aculo.us">script.aculo.us</a> fame has a <a href="http://mir.aculo.us/2010/10/15/how-we-use-mobile-javascript-in-freckle/">nice post up</a> about creating better mobile versions of sites; rather than just simplifying he argues for creating sites that are actually very usable on a mobile device. I especially like their use of the <a href="http://raphaeljs.com/">Raphaël</a> drawing library.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Sparrow mail for OS X]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/10/sparrow-mail-for-os-x/"/>
    <updated>2010-10-05T06:14:47+02:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/10/sparrow-mail-for-os-x</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a neat new mail client for OS X out called <a href="http://sparrowmailapp.com/">Sparrow</a>. It takes a very minimalist approach to mail and it reminds me a lot of some Twitter clients out there. I like the concept a lot, recasting email as light messages to be read and simply archived, rather than the bigger neatly-filed system I&#8217;m maintaining now (often wondering WHYYYY??).</p>

<p>Only works with GMail for now, but the good news is that includes Google Apps accounts too.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Summarized version of Microsoft response to Reddit]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/09/summarized-version-of-microsoft-response-to-reddit/"/>
    <updated>2010-09-29T10:45:23+02:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/09/summarized-version-of-microsoft-response-to-reddit</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/dk3s0/the_ie9_team_responds_to_your_questions/c10szx5">TL;DR version</a> of the IE9 team&#8217;s <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/dk3s0/the_ie9_team_responds_to_your_questions/">response to Reddit&#8217;s questions</a> is priceless. I kept going back and forth between the full and abridged versions and found it was pretty spot on. I admit to having a weak spot for these sarcastic translations of PR-speak.</p>

<p>This is a good example of a few of the non-answers provided:</p>

<blockquote><p><strong>What is the advantage of IE9 over other browsers?</strong></p>

<p><em>Microsoft monetizes their users through cross-marketing agreements with the 70 launch partners for IE9.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[New version of the Apple Remote app]]></title>
    <link href="http://thedailyt.com/2010/09/new-version-of-the-apple-remote-app/"/>
    <updated>2010-09-28T19:40:13+02:00</updated>
    <id>http://thedailyt.com/2010/09/new-version-of-the-apple-remote-app</id>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting for Apple to update their <a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=284417350&amp;mt;=8">iTunes Remote</a> app, I figured it would be the perfect app for the iPad seeing as i have a Mac Mini at home connected to an amplifier.</p>

<p>Now finally it&#8217;s out, and it works great. Controls iTunes running on that mini from the iPad, and even lists the tracks I&#8217;ve shared from a Linux box running mt-daapd, even if iTunes itself stopped displaying those tracks as of version 10.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  
</feed>
